Parashat Pinhas
The Pinhas Problem
Not everyone is happy with Pinhas' action and its reward.
By Rabbi Kerry Olitzky
This commentary is provided by special arrangement with
the Jewish Outreach Institute, an organization dedicated to creating a more
open and welcoming Judaism. To learn more, visit www.joi.org.

Last week,
Pinhas sent a spear through an Israelite and a Midianite woman simply because
they were having a relationship. In this week's parashah, the title of
which indicates the esteem in which the Rabbis held him, Pinhas' reward is
described: he is placed in line for the priesthood. While I understand that
documentary critics of the Torah explain the political reasons for such an
action, I am still stuck with its message, even if it is edited into the text.
Sometimes the crux
of the parashah just sticks in my gut and I can't seem to find its transcendent
message. Sure any parashah has many things to say and I could easily avoid its
primary lesson. And I recognize the teaching of my youth about not turning a
text into a pretext for saying something else. The message of this
parashah--which begin in last week's Torah portion--is worsened in this week's
reading.
However, it seems
that not everyone is happy with Pinhas' action nor his reward. Immediately
thereafter a census is taken of the people, presumably once again to determine
the readiness of the people for war. Are they really prepared to stand behind
Moses? Were they chastened by Pinhas' actions? Were they emboldened by the act
and its reward?
It is clear that
the Torah text is implying that the census is meant to appraise the disposition
of the people after such actions. The long listing of the various clans seems
to be included to indicate who supported the action or who was indeed prepared
to take conquest of the land.
But then comes the
final story in this narrative--an insertion of the plight of the daughters of Zelophehad.
In this oft-reported case, Zelophehad dies without sons. Thus, there is no one
in the family to legally inherit his land and belongings. His daughters make a
plea that they should be entitled to their father's estate. Moses brings their
case before God, and God rules in favor of the five women. This decision
established an important precedent in Jewish law that has been cited for
generations by those who seek gender equality in Judaism.
It is clear to me that there is a connection between these
three stories. The last one is introduced to soften our judgment against Moses
and God. It is as if to say, "Well maybe they aren't so bad. After all, look
how they supported the daughters of Zelephehad."
I realize that we can't expect to approve of all of the
actions contained in an ancient saga about a group's journey to become a
people. But I also realize that even if we agree that sometimes the ends can
justify the means, we don't have to simply accept what is contained in the text
and then act as apologists when see things with which we don't agree.
There are still those among us who applaud Pinhas' actions,
even if they would shy away from such a violent approach. Nonetheless, their
underlying attitudes are the same. And if we are to be a people that welcomes
in the stranger, as it teaches us in the same Torah that retells the story of
Pinhas, then such attitudes have to change.
Rabbi Kerry
Olitzky is the author of many inspiring books that bring the wisdom of Jewish
tradition into everyday life. He most recently co-authored 20 Things for Grandparents of Interfaith
Grandchildren to Do (And Not Do) to Nurture Jewish Identity in Their
Grandchildren and Jewish Holidays: A Brief Introduction for Christians.