Parashat Mishpatim
Exodus Morality
Whether or not we know the
suffering of the slaves, we are commanded to act as if we do.
By Carol Towarnicky
This
commentary is provided by special arrangement with American Jewish World
Service. To learn more, visit www.ajws.org.
As the title suggests, this week's parashah consists almost
entirely of mishpatim--laws--about everyday living. Directed to a people
who have traveled only a short distance in time and space from slavery, the mishpatim
are anything but mundane legalisms--they are instructions for building a just
society.
One of the most
profound directives is the incredible command, repeated twice in this parashah alone, "You shall not oppress a stranger, for you know the
feelings of the stranger, having yourselves been strangers in the land of Egypt
(Exodus 22:20, 23:19)." This is the epitome of Exodus morality: we must
not perpetrate upon others that which was perpetrated upon us.
Memory of Bondage
This central, Jewish
moral imperative was articulated when the memory of bondage still was very much
alive. Because it is embedded in that memory of bondage, however, it contains
an implied awareness that future generations would need to find a way to keep
that memory vibrant.
The Exodus
morality that is so clearly outlined in this one mitzvah is infused
into our liturgy and rituals. At Passover, the directive to remember goes
further: we re-enact the story as if we ourselves were enslaved and then freed.
The repetition of this story helps us to "turn the memory into moral
dynamic," to use the story as an energizing force for change. The Torah
maps out for us the parameters of how experience can serve as the basis for
moral action. Yet it is not only actual experience, but shared memory that
provokes moral action.
Whether or not we
actually know the suffering of the slaves, we are nonetheless commanded to act
as if we do. As Rabbi Yitz Greenberg writes, "The experience of slavery
that breaks and crushes slaves does not destroy free people. It evokes feelings
of repulsion and determination to help others escape that state." This
divinely-given determination to help others drives our moral responsibility.
Twentieth and Twenty-First Century Atrocities
In the modern era,
of course, Jews have acquired a devastatingly unique understanding of what it
is to be oppressed, abandoned, and subject to atrocity. We ought to infer from
the Exodus morality that our particular knowledge of violence and genocide in
the Holocaust conveys a similar obligation--we must remember and our memory
must inform our responses to others who are suffering genocide and atrocity.
My synagogue has the
privilege of guarding a Torah scroll that was used in a synagogue in the town
of Uherske Hradiste in what is now the Czech Republic. This Shabbat, my
community will say kaddish for the 300 Jews who lived near that
synagogue in the early 1940s. We remember them every year at this time because
it was in late January 1943 that they were moved in transports from a makeshift
ghetto to the Terezin concentration camp. This is the closest we can come to a yahrzeit
for them. In a certain way, we are their descendants and their
survivors. As in our parashah, our shared memory of oppression leads to
a moral dynamic and an imperative to act.
But our tradition is
not content simply to prohibit us from perpetrating oppression or atrocity. The
moral dynamic imposed by our active remembering of both our slavery in Egypt
and the Holocaust is reinforced and expanded in the mitzvah prohibiting
us from "standing idly the blood of our neighbors (Leviticus
19:6)"--not only must we refrain from being perpetrators, we are
prohibited from even being bystanders. It is not enough to refuse to enslave or
kill--we must actively intervene when we see others committing these crimes.
The implication is
that we are never again to allow the world to pretend it doesn't know about
killings and atrocities. In Darfur, an estimated four million people are in need
of humanitarian assistance and protection. In Kenya, violence has erupted after
the recent presidential elections. In Burma, oppression and atrocity continue.
We have a moral
imperative to act, and that imperative is rooted in this week's parashah.
We must continue to raise awareness about what is happening. We must refuse to
hide behind expressions of neutrality, knowing that failure to take sides
always benefits the oppressor. We must pressure our own governments to take the
lead in helping refugees return to their homes and to heighten economic
sanctions on the governments that are enacting or allowing atrocity. We have
been the strangers in Egypt and in Uherske Hradiste. In Darfur, in Burma, in
Kenya--we have a responsibility to protect.
Carol Towarnicky
is a freelance writer in Philadelphia.