Parashat Kedoshim
Intentional Intervention
We must learn to offer hand-ups instead of hand-outs.
By Rabbi Dorothy A. Richman
This commentary is provided by special arrangement with
American Jewish World Service. To learn more, visit www.ajws.org.
One afternoon during an
Introduction to Jewish Philosophy class, my professor posed the following
question: If you are walking by a swimming pool, and you see someone drowning,
what is your obligation to intervene? Must you dive in? Call for help? Throw
her a line?
According to American law, there is no legal obligation to
rescue a person in danger. Jewish law, however, provides a different answer.
The duty to positively act to save a life comes in this week's Torah portion:
"Do not stand idly by the blood of your neighbor (Leviticus 19:16)."
Commenting on this verse, the Talmud (Sanhedrin 73a) specifically addresses the
question raised by my professor:
"Whence do we know that if a man sees his fellow
drowning, mauled by beasts, or attacked by robbers, he is bound to save him?
From the verse, 'You shall not stand by the blood of your neighbor!'"
All
of the situations raised by the Talmud pose potential danger to the rescuer,
yet we are still commanded to act. The Talmud goes on to discuss the extent of
this obligation--explaining that this Biblical command requires Jews to expend
up to all of their resources, financial and physical, to save human life.
Global Implications
Elie Wiesel, speaking at the Darfur Emergency Summit in July
2004, interpreted the ancient verse to highlight its contemporary global
implications:
"Lo ta'amod al
dam re'echa is a Biblical commandment. Thou shall not stand idly by the
shedding of the blood of thy fellow man. The word is not achi'cha, thy Jewish brother, but re'echa, thy fellow human being, be he or she Jewish or not. All
are entitled to live with dignity and hope. All are entitled to live without
fear and pain."
Yet, in our contemporary context, the demand of this
obligation is overwhelming--there is so much need that I am not even sure where
to begin. I am convinced that I need to be involved, but how to do so seems
unclear. Looking at this verse again, I see a subtle, yet crucial,
message.
Lo ta'amod al dam
re'echa literally means, "Do not stand on your neighbor's blood."
Normally, the verb "to stand" is associated with courage and
activism: we value "standing up" for human rights or
"standing" against oppression.
A Subtle Warning
Yet the language of our verse is "standing on"--being
close to the action, yet ineffectual, perhaps even causing harm. Perhaps the
phrase lo ta'amod brings
a subtle warning against causing well-intentioned injury within the
imperative to respond. The potential for well-meaning, misguided interventions
is present in seemingly innocent interactions.
Several years ago, I went to Ziavi-Lume, a rural village in
Ghana, with an AJWS service delegation. I remember the village chiefs greeting
us warmly with a ceremony of drums and speeches. As they welcomed our presence
in their village, they asked us to refrain from giving their children gifts.
They said, "We do not want our sons and daughters to grow up with their
hands out."
This was a warning to us to bring solidarity and service,
not trinkets, to support the community. Previous gifts of candy, clothing and,
especially, one fought-over camera, had stirred up divisiveness and suspicion
in the community. It led the children to see visitors as toy dispensers,
damaging relationships between them and their non-toy-giving parents, and
shifting the focus of a group's visit from solidarity to materialism.
Lo ta'amod al dam re'echa teaches that we are
commanded to initiate intentional interventions. The Global North's duty is to
respond, but not to control. Instead of swooping in to save the day, our aim
should be to support grassroots leadership and initiatives: to offer a hand-up
instead of hand-outs.
To return to the case of the swimming pool: as a lifeguard,
long ago, I learned the classic formula for crisis intervention in the water:
Reach, Throw, Row, Go. To respond effectively in an emergency, it was most
helpful to keep some distance between the rescuer and the person needing help.
Simply jumping into the pool was the option of last resort, for this imperiled
both parties.
Optimally, one extended an anchoring arm to allow the other person
to lift himself out of the water. Lo ta'amod insists that we can't stand
idly by human suffering. We should act with care and awareness so as not to
hold anyone down.
Rabbi Dorothy
A. Richman is the Rabbi Martin Ballonoff Memorial Rabbi-in-Residence at
Berkeley Hillel.