Parashat Ahare Mot
The Sanctity of Elemental Relationships
The juxtaposition
of laws about the high priest on Yom Kippur, forbidden sexual relationships and
laws about blood teach the sanctity of basic parts of life.
By Rabbi Shimon Felix
The following article
is reprinted with permission from The
Bronfman Youth Fellowships in Israel.
This week's parsha, called Acharay Mot--"After the Death of"--begins by telling us
that "God spoke to Moshe after the death of the two sons of Aharon, when
they came near before God and died."
The parsha then goes on to describe the rather long and
complicated ritual which is meant to take place in the Temple every Yom
Kippur--the sacrifices, fasting, and prayers, the scapegoat, and, as a climax
to the day, the offering, by the High Priest, of the incense in the Holy Of
Holies, directly in front of the Holy Ark, in the intimate presence of God.
The reference to the deaths of Nadav and Avihu, the sons of
Aharon, which we discussed a couple of portions ago, in parshat Shmini, seems
to be introduced here in order to give added weight and authority to the
extreme sensitivity concerning the high priest entering the Holy of Holies on
Yom Kippur.
This, the Torah tells us, is an extremely dangerous
interaction--"Speak to Aharon your brother that he should not come at any
time to the Holy [of Holies]…so that he does not die. Only in this way [by
carefully following the ritual of Yom Kippur] may Aharon come into the Holy [of
Holies]…" Only once that ritual has been done according to all its
details, on this one day of the year, may the High Priest enter the Holy of
Holies, and experience the intimate, immediate presence of God.
After the Yom Kippur ritual is detailed, the parsha goes on
to prohibit the offering of sacrifices anywhere but in the Temple; this act is
seen as one of disloyalty, and is termed an act of "whoring,"
terrible infidelity to God and His Temple. After this, the Torah moves along
the following path:
- Do not offer sacrifices outside of the Temple.
- If you sacrifice or slaughter an animal, its blood must
either be offered ritually on the altar, or, if it is not a sacrifice, the
blood must be covered by dirt.
- In no circumstances is blood to be eaten.
- The parsha then concludes with a long list of prohibitions
against certain sexual relations--incest, adultery, and others.
On Yom Kippur, in the morning, the custom is to read the
first part of the parsha, that which describes the ritual of the day.
Interestingly, the custom on Yom Kippur is to also read, at Mincha, the afternoon prayer, the end of
the parsha, the part detailing forbidden sexual relations. Although the first
custom makes obvious sense, what lies behind the practice of reading, on Yom
Kippur, about the forbidden relationships? Moreover, how is the first part of
the portion connected with the end of it?
I think it is important to note that the first and last
sections are connected by more than the fact that we read them both on Yom
Kippur: The opening section, detailing the Yom Kippur ritual, and, specifically
the climactic moment of the high priest entering the Holy of Holies, uses words
denoting coming near and entering.
First, we are reminded of how Nadav and Avihu died "b'korvatam lifnay hashem"--"when
they came near before God." We are then told how Aharon may enter the
sanctuary--"Bezot yavo"--"with
this he may enter." The same word that was used regarding Nadav and
Avihu's coming near God is used over and over in regards to the sacrifices
which must be brought on that day--"V'hikriv
Aharon"--"and Aharon shall bring near" (i.e. offer,
sacrifice).
So, too, in the section at the end of the parsha, detailing
the forbidden relationships, we see the same key words. The section opens with
the following words--"Every man should not come near ("lo tikrevu") to their own flesh
[close relatives] to reveal their nakedness." The same root "karov," to be near, is used to
describe what happens on Yom Kippur in the Holy of Holies, and also to describe
the relationships--the "coming near"--which the Torah forbids.
This connection between the ritual of Yom Kippur and the
forbidden unions communicates to us a remarkable insight about the nature of
intimate relationships. The Torah is clearly paralleling the intimacy one
achieves with God in the Holy of Holies with intimate sexual relations. Just as
the one must not be promiscuous, casual ("Speak to Aharon your brother
that he should not come AT ANY TIME to the Holy [of Holies]…so that he doesn't
die."), so too, our sexual relationships must not be that way.
The coming near to, the entering of, the Holy of Holies,
God's presence, described in the first section as an act which demands
sanctification, ritual, and loyalty (remember the warning afterwards not to go
"whoring" after other Gods by making offerings outside the Temple--outside
the relationship) is paralleled by a similar view of sexuality. Our intimate
relationships must also be sanctified, must be seen as something to be entered
into with appropriate ritual, and to the exclusion of other unions.
It is, I think, startling to realize that the Torah, by
equating these two things, is saying something radical about the ultimate
importance of our intimate personal relationships. Just as our relationship
with God is not to be taken lightly, and is of great, even cosmic importance--is,
in fact, life-threatening in its significance--so, too, must we understand the
nature of our intimate relationships.
The Torah sees human sexuality as something that closely
parallels our relationship with God. Just as Eve, upon the birth of her first
son, Cain, gave him his name because, as she said "Caniti ish et hashem"--"I have gotten a man, like (or
with) God," we, too, are meant to see the procreative act as somehow
divine, as linking us with God. Hence the concern, on the part of the Torah,
that we approach that act, and the relationship pertaining to that act, with
the same care, commitment, seriousness and sense of sanctity with which we
approach our intimate moments with God.
This is paralleled with the prohibitions against spilling
animal blood without the attendant ritual of burying it, and against eating
blood, which function as the bridge between the opening and closing sections of
the parsha. Blood, the life force, the symbol of life itself, must be related
to with dignity, respect, and care, just as our intimate relationship with God,
and our intimate human relationships must be.
The Torah, in these three sections, is delineating for us an
attitude, a world view, which relates to the most basic and powerful acts in
our lives with sanctity, respect, attention, and spirituality. To relate to
these elemental relationships and experiences in a casual, off-handed fashion
would, in effect, define our lives themselves as casual, and of little
significance.
Rabbi Shimon
Felix is the Israel Director of the Bronfman Youth Fellowships in Israel.
He lives with his family in Jerusalem, and has taught in a wide variety of
educational frameworks in Israel and abroad.