The Matzah
Baking Machine
A 19th-century
controversy
By Philip Goodman
It was inevitable that a matzah-baking machine would be
invented during the Industrial Age, but the use of this item was not without
controversy. It is easy to tell who won. Just walk into any supermarket before
Passover and there are shelves of machine-made matzah. Still, even today, many
Jews will insist on handmade matzah for the seder. Reprinted with permission
from A Passover Anthology (Jewish
Publication Society).
In about 1857, the
first matzah-baking machine was invented in Austria, beginning a heated
controversy that raged for half a century. Dr. Solomon B. Freehof has given us
a full account of this dispute, which he calls "one of the most
acrimonious discussions in the history of the responsa literature."
However, this should not be surprising as this was, indeed, a radical
innovation for the fulfillment of a duty whose execution had long ago been
elaborately defined to the minutest detail.
The newly invented
machine kneaded the dough and rolled it through two metal rollers from which it
came out thin, perforated, and round. It was then placed in an oven. As the
corners of the dough, cut to make the matzot round, were re-used, it was
feared that the time elapsing until these pieces of dough were used again might
allow them to become leavened. A later machine was developed that produced
square matzotso that there would be no leftovers. Other subsequent
improvements in the machinery speeded up the entire process of production,
leading to a general acceptance of the modern method. Meanwhile, many
distinguished rabbis raised their voices in protest against the new machine,
while others, equally respected, permitted its use.
Solomon Kluger of
Brody, in a letter to Rabbi Hayyim Nathan and Rabbi Leibush Horowitz of Cracow,
Galicia, where the machine was already in use, prohibited the eating of the
machine-made matzot,especially for the matzot mitzvah [the
matzah eaten to fulfill the commandment at the seder]. This letter and
similar pronouncements by other rabbis were published under the title Moda'
ah le-Bet Yisrael ("Announcement to the House of Israel,"
Breslau, 1859). In rebuttal, Rabbi Joseph Saul Nathanson published the pamphlet
Bittul Moda'ah ("Annulment of the Announcement," Lemberg,
1859).
|

|
|
Making matzah without a
machine. Photo credit: Jewish.co.uk.
|
One of Kluger's most
telling arguments was that the opportunity given to the poor to earn money for
their Passover needs by working in matzah bakeries would be denied to them, as
the use of machinery required fewer manual workers. He and his adherents also
argued that matzah shemurah ["watched" matzah that is prepared
in less than 18 minutes to be certain that no leavening has taken place],particularly,
must be made with the intention of fulfilling the precept that requires the
understanding of a mature adult. They also claimed that there was a suspicion
that the pieces of dough left in the wheels of the machine, which were
difficult to clean, would become leavened.
In the forefront of
the rabbis who permitted the use of machinery was Joseph Saul Nathanson of
Lemberg. They refuted the arguments of the opposition seriatim. If concern need
be expressed about the displacement of the hand-bakers, the same solicitude
should be shown to scribes whose replacement by the printing press had been
universally accepted. They also held that these matzot are baked with the
intention to comply with the law, as it is necessary for an adult to start the
machine. They had no fear that the dough would be left in the machines as they
are cleaned well and often. Furthermore, they contended that the machine speeds
the process and is more efficient than the men and women who worked in the
bakery day and night. The views of Nathanson and those who sided with him have
been accepted by most Jews.
Copyright 1993 by the Jewish
Publication Society.